tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24875972.post8063401648031307778..comments2023-10-10T06:34:34.687-04:00Comments on Alico Dreams: Back in the AlicoJeremy Mastenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00502605705151894028noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24875972.post-60919611842802601752007-05-07T20:38:00.000-04:002007-05-07T20:38:00.000-04:00P.S. Do not be envious of my home city- Jerusalem...P.S. Do not be envious of my home city- Jerusalem on the Brazos is a picturesque city, set upon the majestic Brazos River, in a lush and verdant region of your state.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24875972.post-65473395696327238712007-05-07T20:37:00.000-04:002007-05-07T20:37:00.000-04:00Sure- think of the uses of the flamethrowner at th...Sure- think of the uses of the flamethrowner at the law school<BR/><BR/>1. Cherry Jubilee to go with the Dr. Pepper float day.<BR/>2. Throw some burgers on a baking sheet, and blast away- instant charburgers.<BR/>3. Put a gyros cone on a spit next to the Gummi Bear- hit it with the flamethrower from the other side, and wait for the metal to glow (radiate heat)- instant Gyros cooker!<BR/><BR/>ChicagoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24875972.post-88628237919262759042007-05-06T23:45:00.000-04:002007-05-06T23:45:00.000-04:00You are correct-- I would trust Chicago more with ...You are correct-- I would trust Chicago more with a flamethrower more than I trust you with one. I think there is a good chance Chicago would use it for cooking, and that would be fun.Mark Oslerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12260378085599864212noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24875972.post-86771790434577871192007-05-03T13:00:00.000-04:002007-05-03T13:00:00.000-04:00Mayoroni hereIf it's any comfort, I would trust yo...Mayoroni here<BR/><BR/>If it's any comfort, I would trust you with a flamethrower before Chicago . . . I think.<BR/><BR/>And on the uni-sex/alternating floor bathrooms: perhaps when the building was built, very few female employees? I don't know how old Waco's version of angkor wat is, but maybe it is a vestige of patriarchal design structure. or maybe having only one bathroom per floor was a because doing so was the only way they knew how to run the plumbing up a building that tall at the time.<BR/><BR/>Rock onAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24875972.post-24823275594480243092007-05-03T12:39:00.000-04:002007-05-03T12:39:00.000-04:00I lived in a dorm like that. I would have used the...I lived in a dorm like that. I would have used the boys bathroom (on my floor) more often if it wasn't disgusting. The girls bathroom was disgusting too, but usually only on weekends and at least it was more familiarly disgusting. I'm sure they did it to be more economical though. Although with double the traffic of two floors going to their gender's bathroom instead of just one, it got disgusting a lot faster. Which meant the cleaning crew got angry and charged us extra on our housing bills. And no, I'm not kidding. Isn't that sad?Yeehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06924486844215332905noreply@blogger.com