In the midst of Practice Court, a fun thing for my fellow classmates and I to do is complain. For example, I could tell you about how much it sucks that while my fellow 3Ls across the country are getting their golf scores below 100, I'm reading 100 pages every night on deemed admissions or electronic discovery or the three-day add-on in Texas courts. But every once in a while, you realize that you made a smart decision three years ago.
Part of the Practice Court experience is serving on a jury while your classmates present, defend, and judge cases. Thursday, I sat on a jury in a case where this guy set his wife on fire just outside the courthouse---where she had gone to testify against him for using their infant son as an ashtray. The prosecutor had promised to keep her safe once she got to the courthouse, then didn't keep his promise. At least that's how me and one other juror saw it. The other two thought it was her fault for walking out of the courthouse with her husband. And the four of us went around and around for about 20 minutes (a very long time in the PC world).
I realized that I made a good decision in picking Baylor later that night when I noticed that the two compassionate jurors were both married men and the two compassionless jurors were both single men. I've always heard that you have to pick your jury carefully, but now I see that it really makes a difference. Jurors are not interchangeable. I knew that in a book sense. Now I know it from experience.
In case you were concerned, we ended up compromising that it was half the prosecutor's fault and half the lady's fault.
1 comment:
When I told Jon the facts of the case, my very much not single husband said the woman was a moron. If it has anything to do with marital status, I think it falls in line with who the guy is married to (in that it shows whose ideas you've adopted and whose ideas you're most compatible with). Your wife is a total sweetheart. I'm heartless except when it comes to animal welfare. :)
Post a Comment